In academia in recent decades, the term ‘reception’ has been used to refer to post-classical interpretations of classical antiquity (Martindale, p. 1-2). This essay will be an examination of some ‘receptions’ of ancient Rome. I’m not an expert on ancient Rome but I’ve cobbled together a number of sources on the subject. I cover quite a few different topics, and the section on the Nazis at the end is a bit of a detour, but I hope I’ve managed to tie it all together well enough. I’ve decided to use formal referencing, with author’s surname referenced in-text and a bibliography at the end.
Thanks for your very interesting essays. I do find it odd that only white people who look out for their interests are considered Nazis. Can't whites do that and not hate other groups? I think the Brits did that fairly well in India but their superiority excited envy. Seems to be such a problem that our elites now consider white supremacy as the culprit which must be eradicated through mass non-white migration and racial (and sexual) quotas – and a kind of worship of blacks (see, Kneeling Nancy and the Sacred Victim). The fact is, humans need to believe in something, even an impossible and insane thing imagined as Diversitopia.
Thanks for your very interesting essays. I do find it odd that only white people who look out for their interests are considered Nazis. Can't whites do that and not hate other groups? I think the Brits did that fairly well in India but their superiority excited envy. Seems to be such a problem that our elites now consider white supremacy as the culprit which must be eradicated through mass non-white migration and racial (and sexual) quotas – and a kind of worship of blacks (see, Kneeling Nancy and the Sacred Victim). The fact is, humans need to believe in something, even an impossible and insane thing imagined as Diversitopia.